Sarri admits Chelsea are in trouble over centre back injury crisis

You are currently viewing Sarri admits Chelsea are in trouble over centre back injury crisis
Chelsea manager Maurizio Sarri
  • Post published:May 2, 2019

Maurizio Sarri believes Chelsea are ‘in trouble’ for their Europa League semi-final due to a centre back injury crisis.

Gary Cahill will miss Thursday’s semi-final first leg with an Achilles injury, leaving David Luiz and Andreas Christensen as Chelsea’s only fit senior centre backs.

Cesar Azpilicueta will cover centre back at the Commerzbank Arena, with Antonio Rudiger also sidelined for three months after knee surgery.

‘Gary Cahill has an Achilles tendon injury,’ said Sarri.

‘We hope to recover him in one week. So we are in trouble with the centre backs. For the last two trainings we played with Azpilicueta at centre back. So we are in trouble.

‘We’ve played 58 matches, so injuries are typical. We were lucky previously, but not in the last 10 days.’

Chelsea skipper Azpilicueta insisted he is ready to step in at centre back if required.

‘I’m ready to play wherever the manager needs me to play,’ said Azpilicueta.

‘But I can adapt to different positions. So I’m ready for it.’

Sarri explained that Germany defender Rudiger will be sidelined for three months after surgery to repair the meniscus in his knee.

Chelsea’s Italian boss revealed that Rudiger actually tore his meniscus in the Blues’ 2-0 Premier League loss at Liverpool on 14 April.

The 26-year-old returned to action for Sunday’s Manchester United trip, only to pull up again, and unable to push through to the campaign’s conclusion.

‘Rudiger is out for at least three months, I think,’ said Sarri.

‘He’s upset of course, but is very strong and I’m sure he will come back stronger. We tried to arrive at the end of the season, but the injury was there. He had a problem with his meniscus, it was broken.

‘We tried to arrive to the end of the season because sometimes you are able to play for one month [with the injury]. But the situation was the same.’